Personally, I logged 37 days of game time in Cold War since its launch and it is my favorite COD to date. I can see why some people would prefer one over the other, and vice-versa, so you'll get a mix of comments which may not pertain to your personal preferences. Outside of both being named "Call Of Duty" they may as well be considered entirely different franchises. IMO only - try both games if possible and then choose.
Thats not true halo is getting there halo infinite multiplayer actually happens to be quite good the campaign was better and atleast they have anti cheat that works cod has been a spawning ground for cheaters just as much as sitting water is for mosquitoes so cod does have competitors because there are games of better quality than cod games the only difference is people are excited for the cod games because there have been good ones in the past and are expecting them to be great so they get more sales cod 4 was the best of all but now its dead and there is no effective anti cheat so pretty much what is left is hackers and then the rest are players that didn't get the newest game and those people usually dislike the hackers ruining the game swbf2 also challenges cod because they are only at the second game and in the middle of making the third and swbf2 is not anywhere near dead the game still has a mass amount of players playing the game so battle front 2 is thriving even though the game had a rough start unlike cod vanguard which started out badly and still is doing quite badly
0 kommentar(er)
